fuel economy estima
Artikel Terkait fuel economy estima
Owner Review: Brilliant handling and fuel efficient - My 2019 Mazda CX-3
Peace of mind, free maintenance, brilliant handling, good build quality, fuel efficient, reliability,
Owner Review: Comfortable handling and good fuel economy - My Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT AUTO
have considered include: Toyota Fortuner, Toyota Land CruiserThe reason why I choose this car Good fuel
2020 Proton X70 CKD fuel consumption test, 7.6L/100km possible?
Then the Proton X70’s 60-litre fuel tank was brimmed.Driving behaviour was as per a normal driver
Honda City vs Nissan Almera vs Toyota Vios: Which B-segment in Malaysia offers the best fuel economy?
With claimed fuel consumption for all these newly-introduced B-segment sedans hovering below the 6-litre
Ratings: Mazda CX-5 2.5L Turbo fuel consumption, did not score very well but still acceptable
The trip computer displayed an average fuel economy of 9.7 litres per 100 km (10.3 km/L).We made our
Owner Review: Bad fuel economy but reliable engine - My 2007 Proton Waja Campro
Fuel economy wise, if you have a lot of city driving then it wont be very efficient, however the car
Proton X70 1.8T 2WD fuel consumption, 7.5L/100 km possible only if you don't get stuck in traffic jams – Ratings
We put Proton X70 through our WapCar fuel consumption test and here are our Proton X70 fuel consumption
Top 5 brand new fuel-efficient cars in Malaysia that aren’t Perodua
To most average Malaysians, one of the key factors in buying a car is good fuel economy and for a lot
Can fuel additives improve fuel economy and increase horsepower?
fuel additives?
2019 New Nissan X-Trail – Should you pick more seats or better fuel economy?
7-seater practicality or fuel efficiency?
Pros and Cons: 2020 Perodua Bezza – Excellent fuel economy but why the fixed steering?
10% SST.Here’s a quick overview of the 2020 Perodua Bezza’s pros and cons:Pros: Excellent fuel
How fuel efficient is the Toyota Vios?
Toyota claimed improved fuel consumption compared to the previous powertrain, but by how much?
Oil-rich Saudi Arabia bans 16 carmakers for failing fuel standards
roaming the streets of Riyadh and Jeddah.However, even the Saudis realise how important it is to improve fuel
Isuzu D-Max’s 1.9L Blue Power engine shows its prowess in a 1,000 km/1-tonne/1 tank fuel economy challenge
the D-Max for a thorough PUSPAKOM inspection to ensure the pickup truck is 100% showroom stock.The fuel
Pros and Cons: 2020 Proton Saga – Love the value, but fuel economy is poor
is surprisingly decent Ride and handlingCons: No ADAS No keyless entry or engine push start button Fuel
The 7-speed wet DCT makes the 2020 Proton X70 CKD faster and more fuel efficient
road globally.Geely highlighted that unlike DCTs of other carmakers, their 7DCT330 is calibrated with fuel
Can you save fuel by doing aero modifications?
practice of extremely energy efficient driving that squeezes the most mileage out of every single drop of fuel
Ratings: Nissan X-Trail 2.0L fuel consumption, slightly above average score
Nissan claims that the rated fuel consumption for the Nissan X-Trail 2.0L is 13.4km/litre, which translates
My MPV sliding doors are not working, what is the problem?
It could be a Toyota Alphard, Toyota Estima, Toyota Sienta, Nissan Serena, Hyundai Starex, or a Kia Grand
Ratings: 2020 Proton X50 1.5 TGDI - High fuel consumption, but a good all-rounder
Admittingly, it is on the higher side.Fuel economy is not a strength of the Proton X50, but it is fairly
Review Post fuel economy estima
Free camping in the lake in the Spaceship. After trying 3 different vans in NZ, I decided I'm down with the Estima minivan for long drives and busy sightseeing, without much hanging around in between. It drives like a car, has power to pass trucks, gets decent fuel economy, … https://t.co/Wb2PNUUd31
Aerodynamics adds 7 miles to Volt electric range Example #253790 why shape is so important. Fisker announces fuel economy estima..
Cars: 2013 Lexus GS 450h Rated at 34 MPG Highway, GS 350 at 28 MPG: The 2013 Lexus GS 450h’s fuel-economy estima... http://t.co/dznJZqPO
En EU se busca congelar los estándares de -fuel economy- y de emisiones para los vehículos, se estima que esto incrementará las emisiones del trasporte en 10% en el año de mayor impacto. @EnergyInnovLLC (link: https://t.co/nPBnjnfI1o) https://t.co/03tTzBm5SU…
Honeywell Turbochargers Help Chevrolet Cruze Clean Turbo Diesel Post Industry-Best Highway Fuel Economy Estima... http://t.co/3hhTewOBIO
A6 L e-tron: One small step toward zero emissions: Audi would not give a fuel economy estima... http://t.co/tHeHQQAT My site, DIY videos
Ford Fuel $aver!!: Love your car...and love your fuel economy again!! We have the 2013 Ford Focus with an estima... http://t.co/RFbNVRcM
Review Q&A fuel economy estima
Is it boring to drive a Toyota?
I don’t think it’s boring to drive a Toyota. There are so many different Toyotas to choose from. It’s one Japanese brand that will also be respected by the kind of petrolheads who otherwise prefer Citroens or Alfa Romeos, because some Toyotas are actually in enthusiast territory. Tell anyone you have a Landcruiser/ Supra/ Celica/ GT86/ Crown/ Verossa/ Century/ MR2/ etc., and even the most hardened connoisseurs will need to give you a nod of recognition. I’m on my fifth Toyota in twenty years now, and remember having nothing but a blast with every one of them: 1995 ,Corolla 2.0 SRD,, in England: A nimble car with low activation forces that made my three hours of daily commute around Manchester a jiffy. It had a relatively big and torque-strong two litre diesel engine which made this car pretty relaxed to drive. I remember cruising along mostly in high gear, easily steering with two fingers due to the high-powered power steering. 1984 ,Landcruiser HJ60,, in England: Cool as hell. Naturally aspirated six cylinder diesel, and drove like a truck. I loved the sound and feel of it. It’s a classic nowadays. 2000 ,Estima V6,, in New Zealand: An amazing long distance cruiser whose six cylinder engine and automatic made this feel every bit like a Lexus. I zoomed up and down New Zealand with that thing as if it were a private jet. Silky, plush velours interior in beige, two sunroofs, two climate controls… lovely. 2016 ,Auris TS Hybrid,, in Sweden: The Corolla’s European relative, with hybrid drive train. I did really long road trips with it - Sweden-Austria and back, 5,000 km, great to drive. Comfortable suspension, and I never tired of watching the fuel economy monitor. I got 3.9 l/100 km on the autobahn, doing speeds between 120 and 170 km/h. 2018 ,RAV4 Hybrid,, in Sweden: My current Toyota. Makes driving in snow child’s play, and its levels of refinement are above those of the old Range Rover EFis I grew up with. Its fuel economy clearly outdoes them, too - I get 5.1–6.2 l/100 km.
What is the best car in New Zealand for 5 people?
Having lived in New Zealand for a few years myself, I recommend a car with the following criteria: excellent ,crash rating,, because unfortunately, you may need it; ease of ,maintenance, and parts availability; excellent ,handling,, because NZ driving will take you through bends and curves that can be very demanding, like driving in the Austrian Alps; plenty of ,power,, because NZ driving is fast off the line, so if you want to swim along with traffic without feeling like you’re cruel to your car, you need something that accelerates easily and happily; plus you get plenty of seriously steep grades and declines, for which a powerful engine is required just to keep your speed up; excellent ,brakes,, because you’ll be on them a lot. Personally, I really enjoyed my Australian ,Ford Falcon XT ,when I lived in New Zealand. It was the BA model, built in 2004, but they were built for a long time, so you’ll find plenty. It did all of these things very well, and it’s considered a local car with reasonable parts prices that anyone can fix.They last a long time, and the station wagons are huge if you want to lug a lot of gear along. There is a six cylinder and a V8, both of which provide way more power than anyone could ever use without drawing attention. Even the base engine has well over 200 horsepower, and is a real steam machine. It’s the one I recommend if fuel economy feautures in your calculations in any way, because that one consumes the least. It still has a healthy appetite, but it evens out in the big scheme of things, and you’ll get a lot of joy out of it. Mine consumed 9.3 litres per 100 km on the highway, and 12.5 in town. If I were to live in NZ again, it’s what I would buy again. Alternatively, a Toyota Camry could be a very useful vehicle, too. I did drive an Estima van in NZ for a while, but found that high cars sway too much, and make everyone car sick. So, think a car like this: For roads like this: Now, if money weren’t an issue, I could also see myself in a 5-series BMW with an “M-Chassis” in New Zealand. It would be what the Falcon is in German. Some low, heavy, beefy thing that can corner like a go-kart and accelerate like a rocket, possibly as a station wagon. That’s what you’ll want to feel right on NZ roads.
Is it true that German cars Audi, bmws and Benz consume lesser fuel than toyotas, such that a 2ltrscc German car can be equated to 1.3cc Toyota car in terms of fuel consumption?
Aside from the obvious errors in the question? No; German cars in the main, have gone backwards on fuel consumption for most of the last 30 years. The last German car I owned was a 1983 2.2L Audi 100; it used to return 40+ mpg. The A6 that replaced it had a 2.3L version of the same basic engine, that returned 26mpg. The 2020 A6 offers 26–32mpg; so still not back to that 1983 level. Other German brands are the same; they have all gone for acceleration over fuel economy. Even the hybrids favour acceleration over fuel savings at cruise speeds. Diesels are little better; they have gone from frugal, to over turbo’ed fuel guzzlers. Japanese cars have gone the other way, they keep squeezing more power and/or more fuel economy out their engines. My first Japanese car was a tank-like 1990 Toyota Previa 8 seater, with a 2.4L petrol engine; over the 250,000 miles I drove it, it would return ~30 mpg on long journeys, 36mpg on a run from the Midlands to the Alps (it seemed to like French petrol). That was better than my step fathers BMW 523 saloon. The 2020 version (the Estima), is bigger and faster, yet still turns in around 30mpg.
What is the coolest car you have owned?
If we play it ice-cold by criteria like ,“economy, reliability, safety, comfort”, ,my current car easily ticks that box. My hybrid ,Toyota RAV4, is by any measure the best car I’ve ever had, and that’s quite a title, because I’ve had a crazy number of cars. What makes it so fabulous for me, besides the no-brains reliability and durability you can always expect from a Toyota, are these aspects: amazing fuel economy for an SUV; I’ve had the fuel consumption as low as 4.9 litres per 100 kilometres, but it is more commonly at around 5.8 on my daily commutes, even in temperatures down to minus 30 Celsius. high ground clearance and 4x4 mean I can get in- and out of my village in the mornings, whether the snow plow has been around or not. It’s a clever 4WD system, too - the rear axle only with an extra, electric motor, no drive shaft going the whole length of the car. suspension and seats are first rate; this is one of the most comfortable cars I’ve ever had, and I’ve had Lincolns, Cadillacs, BMW, Mercedes, Citroen… it’s amazing as a long distance cruiser. it’s quiet. Interior noise levels are not very different from those of my big Lincoln Town Car. it has a distance radar with automatic braking, which is an absolute god-sent in a country where deer or moose leap out at you in low visibility situations on the highway. But I’ve had some excellent cars before this one that also deserve mentioning. Toyota Auris Hybrid TS 1.8; simply great, and consumed 4.3 litres/ 100 km: Toyota Estima 3.0 V6, in New Zealand; silky, powerful, and like a palace on wheels: Mitsubishi Outlander 2.4 CVT, in New Zealand - a modern SUV with great road manners: Mitsubishi Colt Plus 1.5 CVT, in New Zealand; an absolute space wonder, with a fuel consumption that comes near that of a hybrid vehicle: Ford Falcon XT 4.0 BA, in New Zealand; these are wonderful cars for New Zealand driving. Powerful, good road holding, comfortable: Nissan 300 ZX, in New Zealand; great kit, and a wonderful touring car: Toyota Landcruiser HJ 60 Diesel, in England - no words needed, these are legend, and so was mine: Toyota Corolla SRD 2.0 Diesel, in England; brilliant low cost commuter car that consumed 4.7 litres of diesel per 100 km: BMW 528i, in France; the car is still in the family, now approaching 500,000 km on original engine and transmission. Refined, reliable, beautiful, and incredibly economical on long trips (I still get 6.4 litres/ 100 km): Oldsmobile Delta 88, in Canada; a huge, tatty, but unfailingly reliable and even economical car I bought for one dollar; yes, economical - this thing did 11.3 litres/ 100 km, despite having a 5.7 litre V8, built in 1973: All of these, I would buy again, and recommend to others. And I’m finding my other two cars equally excellent. I’ve had the Pontiac for almost thirty years now, and the Lincoln for about five. The Lincoln, a 2006 Town Car, “Panther Platform”, is famous for its qualities. The Pontiac Parisienne, a 1985 model built in Canada, and basically a GM B-Body Chevrolet Caprice with the base V6, is a no-nonsense low tech beast any bushman with a hammer can fix, and it has served me very well on long road trips all over Mexico, Canada, and the US, as well as Scandinavia.
What was fuel economy like for cars in the old days?
Fuel economy of cars in Europe was actually relatively steady all the way from the 1930s to the 1980s, and has since then improved significantly to the point where your average European car only consumes half of what would have been considered normal 50 years ago. American cars saw a different development. They had similar fuel economy as European cars up until WWII, but then started drinking heavily. This dipped somewhat around the mid-sixties, when some remarkably economical cars came out, but the curve went up again significantly with the advent of emission controls in the early 70s, ironically. So, in the mid 70s, American cars became clean, but thirstier than before. That dipped again in the mid 80s, with the advent of universal overdrive transmission use. American cars built from that point onward usually offered better fuel economy than European cars of equal weight and engine size for a while, but when the 2000s started, Europe took over again, and today, European cars are more economical than American ones, on average. Here is a list of all the cars I have ever owned, in chronological order, what year they were built, and what fuel consumption I typically had with them over the decades: 1973 Mercedes 200 Automatic, 10.0 litres/ 100 km 1967 Mercedes 230 S Automatic, 11.7 litres/ 100 km 1968 Tatra 603, 11.4 litres/ 100 km 1988 Citroen 2CV, 6.3 litres/ 100 km 1987 Citroen CX 25 RD Turbo 2 (Diesel), 6.3 litres/ 100 km 1976 Lincoln Town Car, 23.4 litres/ 100 km 1976 Lincoln Mark IV Coupé, 23.2 litres/ 100 km 1978 Pontiac Parisienne, 17.2 litres/ 100 km 1978 Buick Park Avenue, 17.6 litres/ 100 km 1973 Oldsmobile Delta 88 convertible, 11.3 litres/ 100 km (yes, really!) 1960 Cadillac Eldorado Coupé, 21.0 litres litres/ 100 km 1980 Pontiac Trans Am Gold Edition, 15.5 litres/ 100 km 1978 Dodge Tradesman 100 Conversion Van, 19.3 litres/ 100 km 1981 Cadillac DeVille Coupé 4100, 11.7 litres/ 100 km 1986 Pontiac Parisienne Brougham, 9.7 litres/ 100 km 1976 Buick Park Avenue Electra, 17.2 litres/ 100 km 1980 Mercedes 380 SE, 12.7 litres/ 100 km 1993 BMW 525 td (Diesel), 7.3 litres/ 100 km 1981 Mercedes 200 Diesel, 7.0 litres/ 100 km 1976 BMW 3.0 si, 9.7 litres/ 100 km 1995 Ford Mondeo 1.8, 7.7 litres/ 100 km 1994 Mazda 323 automatic, 7.8 litres/ 100 km 1995 Saab 900 2.3 S, 11.3 litres/ 100 km 1995 Volvo 850, 12.3 litres/ 100 km 1995 Toyota Corolla 2.0 SRD (Diesel), 4.7 litres/ 100 km 1997 BMW 528i, 9.6 litres/ 100 km 2000 Mercedes SLK 320, 9.7 litres/ 100 km 1990 Mercedes 300 SE, 11.3 litres/ 100 km 1990 Nissan 300 ZX, 11.5 litres/ 100 km 2000 Toyota Estima 3.0 V6, 10.3 litres/ 100 km 1984 Ford Falcon Ute 4.1 (Australia), 9.7 litres/ 100 km 2004 Ford Falcon XT 4.0 (Australia), 11.4 litres/ 100 km 2006 Mitsubishi Colt Plus CVT 1.5, 5.6 litres/ 100 km 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.4 CVT, 9.6 litres/ 100 km 2006 Lincoln Town Car Signature Series, 8.4 litres/ 100 km 2016 Toyota Auris Hybrid, 4.3 litres/ 100 km For Europe, the surprising answer to the original question is that the fuel consumption of a typical family car has changed very little from about 1930 to about 1980. During all those years, consuming about 12 litres per 100 kilometres was considered normal and reasonable. What did change though was the performance these cars used to offer for that amount of fuel. While 40 horse power used to be considered respectable in 1930, it had to be more like 100 in 1980, and then continued to go up in increments of about 20 per decade. Additionally, the perception of what was a “normal” fuel consumption for a petrol car changed downwards, a bit like this: 1980: 12 litres/ 100km 1990: 9 litres/ 100 km 2000: 7 litres/ 100 km 2010: 6 litres/ 100 km 2020: 5.5 litres/ 100 km My grandfather drove a Mercedes 350 SE in 1978, which consumed 17 litres per 100 km, and everybody agreed that that was a perfectly acceptable fuel consumption for a car of that size and performance. My parents had a Volvo 244 DL, which consumed 12 litres. Also considered perfectly acceptable. These days, my 2006 Lincoln Town Car, which is quite a bit bigger and more powerful than my grandfather’s Mercedes, also with a big V8 engine, consumes exactly half as much. And my Toyota Auris station wagon, which has a hybrid drive train, but otherwise the same weight and dimensions of my parents’ old Volvo, consumes only 3.4–4.3 litres. A lot has changed, we can see. It’s simple things, too. Cars used to rev like crazy, and had only four gears. You’d drive along at 100 km/h with my grandpa’s Mercedes 350 SE, and it would be sitting at 3.200 rpm, with its big V8, belching out thick clouds of leaded premium petrol fumes through its dual exhaust pipe. That’s nuts. My Lincoln will sit at 1.800 then, which is a big part of the magic, of course. It can do that because it has one more gear.
Beranda