ferrari portofino problems
Artikel Terkait ferrari portofino problems
Nissan MID4 was a mid-engine AWD Ferrari fighter that failed to fly
While many car fans recognise the legend of the first Honda NSX and how it beat the mighty Ferrari, it
What are the most expensive cars launched in 2020?
Standing for Grand Turismo Spyder, the 812 GTS is the first front-engine V12 spider built by Ferrari
Italian style, Korean chassis, built in Malaysia, meet the Fauxrrari F430
The Ferrari F430 is not the greatest Ferrari of all time, nor is it even the greatest Ferrari of the
Ferrari 812 GTS lands in Malaysia, last Ferrari NA V12? From RM 1.5 mill before tax
Naza Italia, the official distributor of Ferrari vehicles in Malaysia have pulled off the wraps for their
Save money and drive safe with these three tyre care tips
Running over or underinflated tyres can lead to a host of problems - from worse wear, bad fuel economy
Frankfurt 2019: Ferrari 812 GTS, letting the 6.5L V12 sing with the top down
50 years ago, the Ferrari 365 GTS4, also known as the Daytona Spider, rolled out of Maranello.
RM 50k for a used Subaru XV, but what are the common problems?
to fork out at least RM 5,000.SBR TechnicOther than that, the XV’s CVT is also known to cause problems
Ferrari F8 Spider launched in Malaysia – 720 PS/770 Nm, infinite headroom, from RM 1.1m before tax
Ferrari F8 SpiderAt a private preview, Naza Italia unveiled the Ferrari F8 Spider in Malaysia, which
That’ll buff out - Italian keeper’s Ferrari 812 Superfast destroyed while being sent for wash
That was the nightmare faced by Genoa goalkeeper Federico Marchetti when his Ferrari 812 Superfast was
From a rare LaFerrari to one-off Pagani Zonda, what other exotic cars do F1 drivers own?
Sir Hamilton the eco-friendly warrior.Fernando Alonso – Ferrari LaFerrariThere are only 499 of
The Ferrari SF90 Stradale costs RM1.9 million but it has no reverse gear!
First, there is the McLaren 765LT and now this, the 2021 Ferrari SF90 Stradale which is just unveiled
Top Rank – 10 production cars with the wildest wings
employees would install them with an electric drill which took about 10 minutes.The legend – Ferrari
Ford, Fiat, Ferrari are working to produce masks/ventilators. Can Malaysian car companies do the same?
You might have read news reports of several car manufacturers – BYD, Ferrari, Fiat, Ford, GM, and
Mick Schumacher to drive his dad’s F2004 ahead of the Tuscan GP
Image credit: Mick Schumachers official InstagramTo celebrate Scuderia Ferrari’s 1,000th Formula
Increasingly powerful cars + overconfident drivers, recipe for disaster?
Your Ferrari 488 Pista musters 720 PS?
Here are the top-5 most overpriced cars in the world
When you buy a Ferrari F8 Tributo, fifty percent of the selling price goes to paying for the Ferrari
Paddle shift in automatic cars, pretty useful or practically useless?
challenger.Photo credit: ultimatecarpage.comHowever, this technology was made more prominent in 1989 by Ferrari
Daniel Riccardo debunks driving sequences of our favourite car movies
, after 8 renditions, is really just an action movie unrelated to cars.The latest being Ford versus Ferrari
Owner Problems: My Honda CR-V's Honda Sensing® system has a major flaw - It does not work in the rain
📢📢Announcement:Ever encounter problems with your car?
Ferrari Roma launched in Malaysia – Baby Ferrari 812, from RM 968k
Naza Italia, the official importer and distributor of Ferrari brand in Malaysia, has introduced the Ferrari
Penawaran Ferrari Portofino bekas May
2022 Toyota AGYA G 1.2
Rp 128,00 JutaRp 3,06 Juta/bln9.881 km
2,5 tahun
Banten
2020 Daihatsu AYLA R 1.2
Rp 106,00 JutaRp 2,55 Juta/bln15.552 km
4,5 tahun
Jawa Barat
2019 Toyota AGYA G TRD 1.2
Rp 111,00 JutaRp 2,67 Juta/bln16.097 km
5 tahun
Jawa Barat
2022 Toyota AVANZA G 1.5
Rp 200,00 JutaRp 4,71 Juta/bln12.211 km
2 tahun
Banten
2017 Toyota AVANZA G 1.3
Rp 151,00 JutaRp 3,59 Juta/bln86.235 km
7 tahun
Banten
Mobil Terkait Ferrari Portofino
Pesaing Mobil Ferrari Portofino
Kamu Juga Suka
Review Post ferrari portofino problems
With the Ferrari in wet mode, the rain isn’t a problem!! #Ferrari #Portofino #driving #performance #Marbella https://t.co/wrOaV9XK3p
@BlackPanthaaYT ferrari portofino would solve your problem theo
@CSRRacing No Ferrari Portofino given to some of the crew - is there a problem?
“[is Heroku...] like taking your kids to school in a Ferrari Testarossa?” This is the issue I have with the @heroku is dead narrative. The problem seems to be that people want to take the kids to school in a Ferrari Portofino instead. The minivan is right there.
Problems of the yacht industry | Court grants billionaire Rybolovlev’s request | Ferrari Portofino https://t.co/xvki80eGds
The decline of Heroku | InfoWorld https://t.co/6MvAPIqqG2 via @instapaper
Review Q&A ferrari portofino problems
Why do I never see TV commercials for Ferrari?
The key to effective advertising is targeting. When you have a product you want to sell, you try to reach as many of the people who might be potential customers as you can, without wasting impressions on those who aren’t potential customers. When you buy advertising, whether it’s print, digital, television, or any other format, the costs are often calculated in terms of “CPM”, which stands for cost per thousand. This is the amount you pay per thousand people that you reach. And in most cases, you pay for any people you reach, regardless of whether they are actually potential purchasers of your product or not. This is why targeting is important. So on to Ferrari. Their “base model” is the Portofino, which starts at $214,53 USD. That’s the entry level Ferrari. And costs go up to about $4.5 million USD for the SP38. So there is a very limited number of potential customers. Television, by its nature, is a broad-reach medium. Its benefit is that you can reach a lot of people. But there aren’t a lot of people in the world that Ferrari needs to reach, so most attempts to advertise on TV would result in showing the commercial to a lot of people who don’t have the ability or interest to buy a Ferrari. In other words, it would be a waste. And there is no television program that caters exclusively to the audience that might buy one. So there’s no good way to target new Ferrari buyers via television without wasting the company’s efforts and money. Note: For those other responders who suggest that the costs of making a commercial wouldn’t pay off for Ferrari, I disagree. They could make a high quality commercial for the cost of one car sale, so making it worthwhile would be easy. The main problem is the media side, not production.
Why is Chevrolet trying to push their newer Corvette platforms from the old sports car route, now more towards the supercar market, will this help allow the Corvette to be sold in other countries if it catches on?
GM is a poor company. You see, they had to choose just one sports car to sell, and so they chose the common denominator, the rear mid-engined sports car, to sell, (but let’s give it some station wagon traits too to please Mama!) Now Ferrari, who has a years-long waiting list and sells every one of the cars they make each year, has deep enough pockets to offer exactly what their sophisticated clientele demands. For the “I want a boy racer Ferrari just like the racetrack Ferraris, but on the cheap” Ferrari offers a base level rear mid-engined sports car, the cheapest they offer, the 2020 Ferrari Portofino. It boasts V8, mid-engine, twin-turbo. All boxes checked for this lowest priced Ferrari - $215,000, including 199 mph top speed. Still a respectable track monster. Now Ferrari offers no less than six models with this small 3.9 liter twin turbo engine, in various stages of tune, up to their combo hybrid model costing over 1 million dollars, the SF90 Stradale. But there is a group of Ferrari Aficionados who remember what made Ferrari great, naturally aspirated V12 motors hung out in front for God and everybody to see, ENGINEERED to make from 689 to 810 horsepower, with no snap of the neck turbo boost and lag, just smooth-as-a-turbine power. They make five+ models of the classic V12 Ferrari, the cheapest will set you back $298,000 and the V12 front-engined cars top out the Ferrari line in the Monza’s - $2 million plus. So there you have it. Cash-strapped GM, able only to field one sports car, which has to be all things to all buyers; and Ferrari, offering no less than a DOZEN different unique supercars, both mid-engined and front engined, with a built to spec catalog to make each car personalized to it’s owner. (And they even throw the catalog in the circular file if the owner wishes to spend more!) GM hopes to build 40,000 cookie-cutter sports cars EACH year: choose from 1 of three option packages and a limited palette of colors. Thats it. Not quite the way you sell to the class of people who specify the unique threads used to stitch the made-by-Hydes craftsmen’s ,Ferrari, Nappa leather, produced using Full Grain hides from cold climate cattle. Corvette says “me too” and offers Napa leather - don’t go there, it is not the same and it is not pretty. GM cannot afford to cater to the affluent Ferrari owner; so everything they sell they start off bragging how cheap they can sell it to the middle class, including the Corvette. “They can get it for us wholesale!” Will the C8 sell well overseas? Time will tell. But the bargain shopper in Europe thinks a 2 liter engine in a car is obscenely large and petrol wasting. Will Ferrari lose a client with their purchase of a Euro-spec Corvette? Perhaps if Chevy can fit turf-friendly tires to the C8 to allow its use as a golf cart. After all, one of Chevy’s bragging rights is the ability of the new C8 to fit two sets of golf clubs in it’s rather large derriere’s trunk. That’s the problem with GM’s dilly-dallying: one minute they tell their engineers to build a world class beater sports car; the next minute they are telling the engineers forget the carbon fiber tub (frame) for a light weight sports car. Instead they MUST make the C8 bigger and heavier than any previous Corvette (C1-C7) ever produced, just to make it a grocery getter and golf club hauler! “GM engineers haven’t acknowledged exactly how much heavier the new (C8) aluminum frame is than the C7 design” More Than Skin Deep | Issue 137 | Corvette Magazine “When they (Car and Driver) ,put the car on the scale,, they found that the new ,Corvette Z51, weighed 3,647 pounds—about 200 pounds more than the outgoing model. (!!) They note that their C8 test car had, as all 2020 Corvettes do, a dual-clutch transmission and that the C7 Stingray they compared it to was a manual, which may skew the numbers a bit. ,Chevy, does say, however, that the new DCT is heavier than both transmissions that were available for the previous generation,, so it's all valid. Part of the extra “chonk” is due to the fact that the ,C8, is both longer and wider than its predecessor. Chevy, says that 2020 will be the first time in the Corvette’s history that it’s offered in a right-hand drive configuration for global sales. In order to meet the wider array of regulations, ,extra design components contribute to the C8’s bloating.” 2020 Corvette C8 Stingray Nearly 200 Pounds Heavier Than Outgoing C7,. If the equivalent of an extra man’s weight in the C8, and the lowest bidder for all parts C8 makes the public think “Super Car!”….then kudos to the success of the Madison Avenue hucksters.
What roughly is the cheapest priced Ferrari? Is it best to buy it in Italy?
New, the cheapest Ferrari is the ,Portofino,. It’s a front-engined V-8 convertible, and quite nice. There’s no reason to buy it in Italy, although you do get a tour of the factory if you pick it up there. Used, the cheapest is the ,early Mondial coupe,. It’s a mid-engined 2+2 with a 214-horsepower V-8. They have a reputation for being slow and plagued with electrical problems, although both can be remedied by the aftermarket these days.
Why is Microsoft forcing Windows 10 users to install updates on their computers instead of giving them a choice of whether or not to install them? Should this be illegal?
Whether it “should be” legal or not is pretty meaningless in the real world. People have very different opinions about what should be law, and what should not be. That’s why there are wars. Also governments, parties, politics... Like it or not, Windows is now Software as a Service. You don’t buy it or own it. You buy a license to ,use, it, within clearly defined limits. You agree to abide by conditions and restrictions. SaaS is a well known business model - ,and it’s 100% legal. As to “why”?… Any experienced network admin or desktop support person can tell you there are large benefits. I’ve written about this before. Several times! I get a lot of questions about it. Clayton Jay Hardy's answer to What Windows 10 updates should I avoid? Let’s start here. ALL OPERATING SYSTEMS need updates. Politicians need money - and air to lie with. Moving parts need lubrication. Plants need water and sunlight. Puppies and kittens need love and kibbles. Updates are like that. Part of the picture, you get me? These days, OS updates are mostly about plugging holes, fixing vulnerabilities. Flaws are discovered daily, constantly. They existed all along, some of them for decades - but no one (or very few) really knew. Then some bright coder/hacker type finds a new way to break in, compromise the system, take control. Once that “hole” becomes known, posted, publicized… it’s gotta be patched. So even though now and then an update causes a problem, they’re absolutely necessary. For many years, people bought into ,any, negative bullshit that anyone said about updates. Like Uncle Fred, the man who can’t find his own car in the parking lot. Or little Timmy next door, the one who thinks he’s a hacker. ,Anyone, who said “updates r bad, mkay?”… suddenly they were unimpeachable authorities on Windows design and engineering - ,and people actually believed them., It used to be quite common for me to be called to work on a computer, and find that it had been ,years, since it was updated. People even insisted that I fix their issues ,without updating,!!! (Which I always refused, btw…) People blamed updates for all sorts of things that the update didn’t really do. ,Major software companies even encouraged people not to update Windows,… as if ,they ,knew better than the people who wrote the OS! In reality they were too cheap or hidebound to make necessary improvements to their products. Say you buy a brand new Ferrari for around 350k - but you decide Ferrari engineers don’t know shit about it. Instead, you take it to cousin Bubba and have a few six packs while he “soups it up” for ya. Sound like a good plan? 2020 Ferrari Portofino: An Everyday Supercar for the Very Wealthy Windows Operating System is arguably more intricate and complex than any car, boat, plane or gadget that you’ll ever use. What the hell makes people believe that some self-proclaimed expert knows enough about it to be listened to? Is it perhaps that they ,*want*, to believe? Updates are irritating, so they’d rather have justification to skip ‘em? Got a lil’ secret to share. Speaking as a 20+ year veteran getting paid to support Windows, and as a Windows user since 3.11… I can tell you with zero hesitation that Windows is FAR more reliable now than ever before. Guys like me have fewer problems to fix. Forced updates? They’re a big part of that improvement. Thankfully, the choice to update or not has finally been removed. ,Should have been done long ago. Better late than never. That said, you DO have workable options. ,Windows gives you entirely adequate controls., You can make updates convenient, not be bothered when you are busy. You can say “not now”. You can schedule updates, change your active hours, make updates happen when you’re asleep, not using the machine, whatever. I’d encourage you to look at those options. Be familiar with them. Change them to suit your specific needs. In fact, now would be a good time. ;) About the only thing you ,can’t, do is pull a Nancy Reagan and “just say no”. ,Not without violating TOS. Like that Ferrari, there aren’t a lot of people on this planet who truly *are* qualified to say whether a Windows update is beneficial or not.. Most of them work for a corporation in Redmond, Washington. USA. If ,Microsoft, says a Windows update is necessary… ,it is.
Which is the better car, a Tesla or a Ferrari?
Thank you for the A2A. I’m not the most experienced Ferrari owner as I’m not a fan of the brand overall, but I’ve tried a few models across the range and even lived with a few of them for days/weeks. I own a P100D and I probably have a lot more experience with that, but I can give you a useful comparison. Ferarri and Tesla are hard to compare Ferrari is a car you buy for the status, the looks, and the fun. The only reason why Tesla ever produced a car that got close to Ferrari status was marketing, and the fact that it couldn’t get the cost down fast enough, so it needed people with the cash to pay for the R&D, and bear the risk of buying a completely new product. More on that later. What does Ferrari do? Sell exclusivity. There is history, flamboyance, racing pedigree, drama, and so much flare to a Ferrari. Building a brand to this stage takes decades of consistently producing dream cars for the world to drool over, case and point driving a red Ferrari and you’re going to turn every single possible head around you. In a rare twist, it’s a car well loved by both genders, because it just looks so darn pretty when specced elegantly. While most supercars only please the inner 10 year old boy inside the owner, Ferrari transcends all kinds of “barriers”. The entry level Ferrari is the California, and starting with this year, its replacement, the Portofino. Historically, the California was a beautiful car, roof down etc, but a fairly laughable excuse for a true sports car, yet it makes up the majority of their sales. From there on, you’re looking at fairly serious cash to get up the Ferrari ladder. Most of their customers aren’t Schumacher level drivers with a passion for lap times, they are just after status, hype and a fun toy, and there’s nothing wrong with that, if they have the means then have at it. Good things , What Ferrari is incredibly good at is understanding their niche customers, and out of all the brands, I think they are the most likely to sell limited edition cars in 2.5 seconds after they are launched, for whatever sticker price they want. Ferrari maintenance is a lot cheaper than what most people would make it to be. Standard servicing and warranty is 7 years on post 2011 cars. It’s not exactly a Camry for sure, but it’s by far the cheapest in its class. Most 458 owners would spend ~2k per year in total or less on their cars, according to many voices on FerrariChat. Prices tend to drop and then pickup. The “family” Ferrari, FF and GTC4Lusso, will depreciate 50% without a doubt, and then float around that price, same for a Cali T/Portofino. Most Ferraris will also depreciate steeply, but the more loved models will always re-bounce in price, so having a thorough knowledge of the market can make ownership an investment, or at least a break even, on some of the cars. Exclusive models will triple in price if not more(F12 TDF, 599 GTO, LaFerrari, Ferrari Sergio, and so on), but it’s foolish to think this could be an investment strategy, because it will take serious “waste” on depreciating models to get an invite to the exclusives, so it’s a “refund” at best. New car launches also demand high premiums. An 812 super fast is not classified as exclusive, but good luck getting a slot as a customer new to the brand. Dealers have a fixed number of slots, and they will say things like “you can have an 812 if you buy a GTC4Lusso”, and that’s how you end up hundreds of thousands over what you thought you were going to spend. Ferrari knows their cars will often do 3k miles before changing owners. It’s not impossible to find a 4 - 5 year old car with 5 - 7 owners, and to have that car be in excellent condition. People who buy them want to try out every new car that comes out, and they only keep what truly made them go “wow”. So they offer 2 year warranty extensions on every used purchase. No matter which dealer you buy the car from, Ferrari itself will be giving you this warranty, which is a very smart thing to do. Their cars are in their class very comfortable, and can often be driven for many miles on end, which is not something you get in any Lamborghini. They are low to the ground, but not so impossibly low every bump will make you jump, or drive at 2mph. It’s a manageable car, even if you really want to daily drive it. They make incredible interiors, and they let you customise everything, even way above say Mercedes, and definitely way above all other competitors, I would go as far as saying they even match Bentley. Lots of colours to choose from, lots of panels you can customise, to match your Ferrari to every inch of your bedroom wallpaper dream, which is quite cool. The leather(or alcantara), the finish, are very high quality, and if you didn’t know any better the sheer look of it can easily outclass the S class. There’s also a very strong club mentality, membership awarded by buying more and more. Anything from an invite to a Challenge Cup, allocations guaranteed for the more limited models(488 Pista, Speciale, Aperta, LaFerrari, etc). I even know directly of people who bought previous year F1 cars from Ferarri, and a few times a year a Ferrari engineering team flies in to help the owner take the car to a proper F1 circuit. That’s insanely cool, and I’m sure a very expensive privilege, and having bought 20 cars off them. Ferraris outlive you, and age just adds character to them. They are almost never high mileage cars, and they will often appreciate in time quite well, and some of the models are simply iconic, like a 1961 250 California Spider. And to be completely fair, they do make properly insane cars, fun, capable, comfortable and so on. I’ve experienced an F12 and it was unquestionably every inch an insanely awesome super car. Bad things Ferrari in recent years has definitely dropped the ball a lot. The newer model cars seem to have regressed. I’ve had the pleasure of experiencing a 488 Spider for a few days, and it was a fantastic looking car. However, suspension, acceleration, technology, speed, drive-ability, were ok, but nowhere near what the word Ferrari would make you expect, and certainly worse than previous generation cars. Here’s Salomondrin, a YouTuber with far more means and supercar experience than I have, but I agree with him 100%, having tried the exact same car in the video. Me being a McLaren fanboy, I’ll compare it to the 720S, as they are in the same price category, and I can honestly say the McLaren is on a different planet in every single possible way, except of course subjective looks. Tech, performance, comfort, you name it. Ferrari hasn’t been coping well with emission regulations, and dropping their famously naturally aspirated engines has taken quite a lot of out the character of the car. It doesn’t sound like a Ferrari anymore, and I know of many 488 owners who’ve gone back to the older 458 for this reason. The tech in the car is a bit crap. Not Lambo bad, but a world apart from McLaren, and two worlds apart from Tesla. You cannot charge your phone while connecting the GPS or audio streaming. You can either charge, or have GPS. This makes no sense, and I’ve often found myself with a dead battery. The display is fun, but clumsy, and quite hard to come to grips with. You get used to it like anything else, but by 2018 standards, it’s quite ancient, and missing a lot of things for daily drive-ability, like proper parking tech The feature I hated the most is the parking sensors. In a normal car, if I get beeping noises when I park, they stop as you stop the car, and don’t come back on when you go. In a 488 they just won’t shut up at all. You park in a tight parking space, and the car will start beeping continuously until it’s clear. Wtf Maranello, what in the actual f were you thinking. You have to try 5 times to get your phone connected. For some reason it’s a luck based game, painfully annoying routine to have getting in and out of the car. Unrelated to tech, even in bumpy road mode the suspension was really punishing, much more aggressive than what I remembered in a 458, so another move backwards. Of course this is specific to a model, but I have no doubt the tech is copy pasted into all models from the same year/generation. Tesla Yes it does currently have some crazily expensive cars in the line up, but it’s a completely different company creating products for everyone. Their prices aren’t there yet, but they are coming down with every generation, so there’s hope they would ultimately get there. Ferrari sells a few thousand cars a year if that, they are a luxury Italian boutique shop, whereas Tesla is trying to pick a fight with Ford, and using Ferrari like cars to show the world just how powerful EVs can be, it’s marketing to them if nothing else. Being a mass market manufacturer does mean selling cars for really high prices is a very bad idea, because you are going to price yourself out of all the mass market, so they are trying to get to a $30k car or less, but that’s just not the reality of a startup. For a more comprehensive review: ,Flavian Alexander's answer to What are some disadvantages to owning a Tesla electric car? A Tesla by comparison to a Ferrari or Bentley has a pretty low quality interior, and it’s certainly not focused on customisation. Yes you can pick one of 5 options, but that’s kind of it, in Ferrari there’s 10 kinds of red, 10 kinds of blue etc. It makes sense, you’re trying to scale production and reduce cost, not play games with fancy cars, but you’re going to love your Ferrari a whole lot more than a Tesla for it’s pretty interior, bespoke to you. Teslas are much much cheaper to run. Regenerative braking and free supercharging(or even paid for) are going to be massively cheaper than running the same number of miles in a Ferrari. Depreciation per mile is a much much bigger thing in an F car than a Tesla. Just like you don’t go out every day in your tuxedo and expect it to keep, it’s the same mentality with the Ferrari. It’s quite practical, so I wouldn’t be surprised if many people do it, but there’s no way you’re going to spend as little as charging in 10mpg car through the city. Regen means you rarely brake strongly in a Tesla, which means discs & pads last a lot longer. Drag races at every traffic light will be quite expensive to maintain in a Ferrari, and a given in a Tesla. Tesla has many All Wheel Drive products in the line up, Ferrari only makes the family Ferarri AWD(FF, GTC4Lusso), afaik. They are meant to be fun cars, not safe cars per se. It does mean a Ferrari can have considerable wheel spin when flooring it, or that it’s easy to slide around the backend, something you want in a supercar or track car. However, almost nothing will compete with the unique blend of practicality and power Tesla offers. There’s no Ferrari that can compete with a P100D up to 70mph, so in city traffic or most driving you’ll ever do on public roads, Tesla will out-accelerate probably any Ferrari except a LaFerrari, but then we’re taking a family sedan vs the most expensive and powerful Ferrari ever made. A Tesla has insane amounts of storage etc, and the power on tap is available every single time. The Ferrari needs a solid combo of grip, weather, road and launch control to keep up. This is a small detail about the car of course, straight line acceleration is not really the important factor. But a P100D can keep up with a Rimac until 80mph, a LaFerrari, the most expensive and insane Ferrari, cannot, just because it’s way harder to have consistent off the line performance in an RWD combustion engine car. The Model S range, even leaving aside the pricy P model, will keep up with any Ferrari you want, it will be a more comfortable, and easier car to drive, it will be more consistent, and overall a far better buy, for a lot less money. In any aspect aside from track driving and flamboyance, yes Teslas are vastly superior cars, it’s all about what you want to get from it. When it comes to looking at the future, Ferrari only makes a single hybrid car, the LaFerrari, with sorry a** 2 - 4kw battery, only useful for basic start stop park manoeuvres. Yet rumours have it the yearly run cost of that sad little battery is in excess of $100k, which is absolutely insane, and makes 0 sense. It’s a fun car no doubt, and every bit an experience, but bang for buck it’s in my opinion overpriced. It’s just the straight up engineering failure of coming up with a useful battery. If a Croatian startup like Rimac can wipe the floor with your most performant car in 100 years with none of your resources, and they do that with their very first car, you’re in deep trouble for the future, because it won’t be long before a 200k EV will be so vastly more capable than any Ferrari ever, and if the Tesla Roadster delivers on the spec promises, that’s going to be fun. Conclusion: ,It’s hard to compare the two, because they are fundamentally apples and oranges, but while Ferrari is the glorious past of the automotive industry, companies like Tesla, NIO, Rimac and so on, are the future, and in the higher echelons of pricing, they have already figured out the problems with batteries, like charge capacity(Rimac does 350kwh charging), overheating, consistency of performance etc. For now, that tech is locked into multi-million hypercars, but as the years go by, it scales up, and it becomes cheaper and cheaper. Supercars will get it, expensive sedans will follow, and probably in 1 - 2 decades all cars will. EVs will vastly outperform all current petrol engines. Torque vectoring/traction control, acceleration, drive-ability, tech, autonomous are just on a completely different tier in the top range electric cars of today, but unlike petrol engines, they have a massive wave of adoption, investment, engineers, all pushing the envelope. If this sounds too good to be true, go test drive a Model S P100D. It takes a confident driver to get all the smiles, but you will experience in 2 seconds flat exactly what I’m talking about, you get really addicted to the perfect power delivery, stability, comfort and confidence, all with no compromise. I’m incredibly lucky that I get to enjoy it daily, and I can honestly say the combination is insanely addictive. No one is pushing the petrol engine anywhere anymore, except for maybe the likes of ridiculously expensive supercars/hypercars, and the improvements are 2 - 3% maybe, not quantum leaps like in EV tech.
Which supercars are suitable for taller people?
I already know lots of folks are going to say the r8, so I’m here to counter that. I’m only 6ft, but I found the foot wells to be a little shallow for my legs. I think it has to do with the fact that’s it’s AWD so it has axles down there. Headroom was alright though. I always feel pretty good in the McLaren 570, and I’m sure the new GT is even better! I fit into the Ferrari 458 with no problem as well. A Ferrari California or Portofino should be no problem.
What is the most interesting thing you have experienced while on vacation in Italy?
Two things happened to me on two different occasions, one in 1983 and the other in 1998. 1983: My wife and I arrived to Rome airport from Miami. We took a cab and at the airport exit we are stopped. Why? Because the cab was not authorized to operate that day. Apparently pollution was so bad that they had a sytem whereby cabs could operate only on the day their tag or licence plate had an even or odd number. This driver was working on the day he was not suppossed to ! We had to walk back to the taxi stand with our bags ! (a good 100 meters mind you). I complained and then took another cab and again !!! incredible, the same problem. We had no idea of the problem , the dispatcher assured us this time everything was OK ! This time I said enough, we walked back into the terminal and requested a Limo. That should do it I thought !! The limo was nice, the driver friendly but somewhere between the airport and downtown the police stopped us. Why ? You guessed it ! Wrong licence plate number ! Now comes the fun part………The driver received the ticket, a big one, but was allowed to continue to our hotel. On arrival the driver begged me to please help him. He had a family, two kids etc. and that fine would carry a licence suspension and that would kill his business !He begged me to go with him to a Notary Public to testify that he came to pick us up because we were distant family from America which is the only way he could justify that he was “not working” but rather went to pick us up as family which is allowed regardless of the license plate. I left my wife at the hotel and I went with him to the Notary. Three hours later we walked out. That was an experience onto itself. The Notary knew what he was doing but I played along, what the heck, this was an experience I was not about to pass up !! It worked, the guy then went with me to the police and showed the paperwork from the notary plus the fine and I played a.long swearing that whatever he said was true, I was cousin Enrico (henry actually) from Miami. The fine was revoked right then and there. The driver, Antonio (I will never forget his namne) thanked me up and down and asked me when we were to return to the US as he would like to pick us up at the hotel and gake us to the airport for free as a token of his appreciation. I said OK, next Sunday at 06:00 as we had an early flight to London to connect back to Miami. I never thought he would come for us but sure enough at 05:45 a.m. we received a call from the front desk with the mssg. in italian-english; “ You driva Mister Antonio isa awaiting for yu donwestairs” !! We gave each other a big hug at the airport !! 1998: On heaven knows which italian trip later (we love Italy) we drove from Spain to Florence and rented a house in Mercantale smack in the middle of “Paradise” aka Tuscany !! On the 20 Miglia highway from San Remo to Portofino there are tunnels and bridges with incredible views etc. It is a two lane highway. At one point there was a Ferrari coming up fast on the left lane. I had a truck in front of me on the right lane so I got on the left lane and made the Ferrari slow down fast. I did this on purpose. He was furious as I was on purpose going slow. He was giving me the lights and blowing his horn. I opened my window and with a hand sign which somehow the driven of the Ferrari understood, I asked him to rev his engine in the tunnel so that we could hear that incredible sound that only a Ferrari engine makes. He did and at that moment I returned to the right lane signaling him to fly past me, which he did. I had two Ferrari junkies in my car and when that Ferrari flew by at warp speed with that incredible engine noise all of ius in the car well, you know what……………….., specially when he blew his horn and waved goodby !! What could I say folks. That´s Italy for you !!
Is Internet Explorer really as bad as everyone tries to make out?
Beating A Dead Horse Oh HELL yes! Internet Exploder really is (and always was!) ,*that*, ,bad, as almost any geek on the planet will happily tell you., ,The thing is,, ,many non-technical users still have no idea just ,how, bad it is - because they've never used anything else. No basis for comparison. Something has to convince them to try a decent browser like Firefox or Chrome... and then it generally takes some time, learning and adaptation, often accompanied by sincere bitching and moaning. But fairly quickly, they see the differences. They notice the nicer things. ,Then, they get it. Picture this: You were given a ratty old delivery truck when you were just a kid. 20 years pass, ,and you’ve never driven anything else but that same worn out truck., After all, you love it! You are totally familiar with all of its quirks. Besides, it has served you faithfully! You should return and reward it’s loyalty. Right? Right? Replies Then someone convinces you to try out a new sports car. And (after you adapt to it) you realize there ,ARE, better things out there. A ,lot, better. 2018 Ferrari Portofino Then eventually, the other shoe drops. It dawns on you… ,you could have been driving the sexy red convertible all that time. I started using browsers waaaayyyy back at the dawn of the internet, when AOL and Yahoo were new and cool. Compuserve, Prodigy, Netscape Navigator… I was there. I could go into long and tedious detail about why Internet Explorer was such a dog turd, thru almost every iteration. Ridiculous security vulnerabilities, endless glitches, problems, slower than a sloth on valium, etc… Bleh. It’s much easier to simply refer you to the wiki. Internet Explorer - Wikipedia That - and I should note one other (fairly relevant) item. Internet Explorer is ,*,OFFICIALLY*, FREAKING DEAD! Microsoft discontinued the old chunk of shite in 2015, - and replaced it with Edge. Edge isn’t exactly the best thing since sliced bread, not much more popular than Windows 8, in fact… but it ,is, much faster and more secure than “Exploder” ever was. Yes. Microsoft itself, has finally started the long painful process of killing off I.E. It ain’t gonna happen fast. It will take years, maybe decades, to put the final nails in this particular coffin. But at least they’ve taken the first step, at long, long last. If that’s insufficient to convince you that I.E. ,is, “really as bad as everyone tries to make out”, I don’t know what else to say. Perhaps I should let a highly respected tech publication say it? The following WIRED article is from 2016. The Days of Microsoft Internet Explorer Are Numbered—But Its Sorry Legacy Will Live On
FAQs Terkait ferrari portofino problems
Is Ferrari Portofino available in Paddle Shift?
No, Ferrari Portofino isn't available in Paddle Shift.
Is Ferrari Portofino available in Front Foglamps?
No, Ferrari Portofino isn't available in Front Foglamps.
Does Ferrari Portofino has Seatbelt Reminder?
No, Ferrari Portofino doesn't have Seatbelt Reminder.
Beranda