ford ranger 6x6
Artikel Terkait ford ranger 6x6
New 2021 Ford Ranger Raptor X is seeing Red in Malaysia, priced RM 6k more
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC) has added a new variant to its Ford Ranger range – the special
New 2021 Ford Ranger facelift debuts – Should the Hilux be afraid?
Ford has just globally debuted the new 2021 Ford Ranger facelift alongside the Everest facelift in Thailand
Review: Ford Ranger WildTrak, when adventure meets concrete jungle
(Model | Gallery) The thinking mans Ford Ranger Raptor Same powertrain as the Ford Ranger Raptor, 213
New vs Old – 2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak facelift vs pre-facelift
Yesterday, Ford debuted the 2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak facelift in Thailand and it looks, well the same
Thailand's 2021 Ford Ranger FX4 Max is a budget Raptor with 213 PS
Ford Thailand has just launched the 2021 Ford Ranger FX4 Max, and you might call it a budget Ranger Raptor
Next-gen, all-new Ford Ranger to debut in 2022, plant construction underway
Source: CarExpertThe next-generation, all-new Ford Ranger is set to make its debut in 2022, said the
The 2020 Ford Ranger Thunder is a more handsome Ranger Wildtrak we hope to see in Malaysia
Ford has just unveiled the new Ford Ranger Thunder – a kitted-up Ranger based on the popular Ranger
Limited Edition Ford Ranger Splash sold out!
Ford Malaysia has announced that all 19 units of the Ford Ranger Splash have been pre-booked ahead of
Owner Review: 3 Years of Ownership, Owning and Upgrading My Ford Ranger
** This article is the personal experience of a 2017 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT T6FL owner and does not necessarily
Ford Ranger enjoys 12 % increase in sales in Q3 2019
The all-new Ford Ranger continues its segment high in the third quarter of 2019 with an increase of 12%
The RM 126,888 Ford Ranger FX4 is a dressed-up Ranger XLT, no additional power
Sime Darby Auto Connexion (SDAC), the official distributor of Ford vehicles in Malaysia has just introduced
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger Wildtrak - Love the comfort, but is it worth RM 150k?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak received a mild nip-and-tuck in August 2020, in which the pick-up truck received
In Brief: Ford Ranger, combining the best of utilitarian and refinement
(Model | Gallery)The Ford Ranger is a 4x4 pickup truck that made a global debut back in 2015.
5-year warranty for 2021 Ford Ranger, upgrade available for current owners
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC), the sole distributor of Ford vehicles in Malaysia, introduced a new
Limited Edition Ford Ranger Splash launched in Malaysia, available only on Lazada
Ford has embraced the online buying trend by unveiling the Limited Edition Ford Ranger Splash, in conjunction
Next-gen 2022 Ford Ranger could gain 267 PS, 680 Nm PHEV variant, arriving in Malaysia in 2023?
Details of the next-generation 2022 Ford Ranger have surfaced, courtesy of Australian publication CarExpert.According
Ford Ranger 2.2L Wildtrak Has a Big Improvement Than the 2.2 XLT
The sole distributor of Ford in Malaysia-Sime Darby Auto Connexion, introduced the Ford Ranger Wildtrak
2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak's power roller shutter - here's how it works!
Making its world debut in Thailand last November, the 2021 Ford Ranger now sports a refreshed look and
RM 2,000 Ang Pao on offer when you purchase a Ford Ranger before CNY
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC) is offering up some awesome ang pao money when you purchase a Ford Ranger
Leaked: Black 2021 Ford Ranger Raptor X - will True Red buyers regret their purchase?
Just over a month ago Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC) took the covers off the special edition 2021 Ford
Penawaran Ford Ranger bekas May
2022 Toyota AGYA G 1.2
Rp 128,00 JutaRp 3,06 Juta/bln9.881 km
2,5 tahun
Banten
2020 Daihatsu AYLA R 1.2
Rp 106,00 JutaRp 2,55 Juta/bln15.552 km
4,5 tahun
Jawa Barat
2019 Toyota AGYA G TRD 1.2
Rp 111,00 JutaRp 2,67 Juta/bln16.097 km
5 tahun
Jawa Barat
2022 Toyota AVANZA G 1.5
Rp 200,00 JutaRp 4,71 Juta/bln12.211 km
2 tahun
Banten
2017 Toyota AVANZA G 1.3
Rp 151,00 JutaRp 3,59 Juta/bln86.235 km
7 tahun
Banten
Mobil Terkait Ford Ranger
Pesaing Mobil Ford Ranger
Kamu Juga Suka
Review Post ford ranger 6x6
M-Gator ?? 6x6 ATV ( Captured in Du Ab , Nuristan ) 1 x Humvee ( Heavily Damaged , Captured in Du Ab , Nuristan ) 3 x Ford Ranger ( Captured in Du Ab , Nuristan ) continued .. pics by @RisboLensky https://t.co/6aYCdX99aN
#324 Ford Ranger T6 #325 Jeep Wrangler Deberti #326 Ford Ranger Raptor #327 Mercedes G63 Amg 6x6 https://t.co/N04Wwjd8n7
Who needs a Mercedes 6x6 when this 6-wheel Ford Ranger is the price of a nice TV? https://t.co/iQ5gNXsQk2 https://t.co/B4fCva3haX
1. AE86 tureno 2. Cadillac 69 3. Camaro ss 69 4. GTR R35 5. 69 ford mustang mach 1 coupe https://t.co/KQxJFhNbCa
How about a stock 4.0L powered 6x6 Ford Ranger with 6 wheel steering? $12,000 cash only. https://t.co/hwjiHeJd2o https://t.co/BfhH8JTR3Y
The Ford Ranger pickup is a...wait a minute. This isn't you typical DT post. This is an insane 6X6 mud machine with dual rear-wheel steering and a diamond plate front bumper that could double as a park bench. #Murica #6X6 #Ford #Ranger https://t.co/KMhUGQAl2p https://t.co/ITb9G6mIHA
Custom 4x4 of the Year: Winners 2020 Stretched SAS Ford Ranger https://t.co/bodVv06zup 2019 Custom Ford F-250 4x4 Tourer https://t.co/cT4fRqWbbN 2018 Duramax V8-powered Ford Ranger https://t.co/cT4fRqWbbN 2017 Patriot Campers’ 6x6 Toyota LC79 https://t.co/5DzKFt8Xbr https://t.co/m6VdDVMQPb
Description: Pickup Trucks Pack By Josha. Here Is A Nice Pack Of Pickup Trucks & 4×4 For Fs19. Included: 2016 Chevy 2500 HD Ford Ranger Raptor 2019 2ND GEN Dodge RAM 3500 Toyota Land Cruiser 200 Volkswagen Amarok Landrover Defender 110 6X6 Authors: Pack by J... https://t.co/hlNADEFFzt
Just look at this 6 wheeled beast which was specially built by 'Hennessey' in the USA. This demands respect and reminds me of the G-wagon 6x6's but in bright orange !! If you own a Ford Ranger and want to make it look a little beefier and meaner … https://t.co/2fEe5ecK8B https://t.co/4KHsCmhSRz
This 6x6 Ford Ranger With Rear Steering For Sale Is Peak Truck https://t.co/z2VkLIrixL https://t.co/Ba1LEqwNbq
Review Q&A ford ranger 6x6
Are there any South American car companies?
Local few. Once upon a time Argentina had several national capital car makers with their own models and licenced. They were all bought by foreign car companies or closed. Brazil still have some local car factories. Agrale - Wikipedia AM 200 G2 AM31 AM11 Agrale 13000 Agrale 14000 There is a few companies in Brazil that make buses. In Argentina we had Industrias Kaiser, IAME-DINFIA (state owned), SIAM, SEVEL, Hispano Argentina. Industrias Kaiser Argentina - Wikipedia Kaiser (IKA) was a joint investment with Kaiser Industries from the US. They produced a variety of Jeep, AMC models and then Renault licences. The most famous product was the Torino Argentino. In the late 70s they were absorved by Renault. Torino Jeep IKA Estanciera IKA Industrias Aeronáuticas y Mecánicas del Estado - Wikipedia Industrias Aeronáuticas y Mecánicas del Estado (IAME), later renamed Dirección Nacional de Fabricaciones Industriales, was the former FMA aircraft factory from the 40s to the 70s, producing along cars, jeeps, trucks. The most iconic truck in Argentina (before the Hilux, Ranger and F-100) was the Rastrojero pick up. Siam Di Tella - Wikipedia Siam Di Tella was a company that went a bit like Samsung making anything, from home appliances to cars, electronic, locomotives, building, etc. But they went bankrupt unable to compete with foreign brands with the massive production and cheaper costs. SIAM 1500 SEVEL was an Argentine joint venture between the local subsidiaries of FIAT and Peugeot that produced under licence FIAT and Citröen-Peugeot models modified for the Argentine market. In the 90s they were absorved by Peugeot. 128 505 504 UNO 405 Hispano-Argentina - Wikipedia Hispano Argentina was a a pre WWII company property of Ballester Molina, one of the first private efforts of defense companies. Ballester Molina is world known for their 1911 .45 pistol and loved for being better than the Colt one. But they also produced engines under licence and 6x6 trucks. Criollo 6x6 Criollo 4x4 Criollo 4x2 civil Currently the Mercosur marker is dominated by the big car companies. Ford, GM, FIAT, Peugeot, Renault, Toyota, Volkswagen have plants both in Argentina and Brazil. Nissan produces in Brazil. Most pick ups are produced in Argentina Fiat Toro, Amarok, the world renown Hilux II, the Ford Ranger, and soon Peugeot and Mercedes Benz will start to produce their 4x4 pick ups in Argentina. Only Nissan and Chervrolet produce pick ups in Brazil. Meanwhile Brazil concentrates most of the producction of cars, specially small and medium size. While in Argentina we produce fewer high end models. The truck companies migrated from Argentina to Brazil in the 90s due less taxes, low to non existent workers regulations, very low salaries. Argentina ended producing some high quality engine and transmission parts for the cheap chassis made in Brazil. Scania, Mercedes Benz, Ford, Volvo, VW, IVECO produce trucks in Brazil. Scania produces the engine shaft, and transmission in Argentina similar as how John Deere produces engines here and sent them to the massive plant to assembly their machinery in Brazil. This is what is produced or to enter production in 2019 in Argentina. A good % of car parts are imported from Brazil and Europe, Citröen has the highest autoparts of local production integration with a 60% of them. The pick ups by the other hand are nearly 80% produced locally, being imported mostly the electronic equipment. Is our strong and naturally the companies are focusing on it, Toyota exports 90% of its production, meanwhile GM ask the government protection from other companies competition and lobbies against emissions and safety regulations which Toyota already uses without being forced by law. Hilux Fiat Cronos And some others: ,Catálogo autos nuevos 0km, fabricados en Argentina
How thick is the armor of a Humvee?
Firstly there are over ,at least 17 variants of HMMWVs aka Humvees still in service today with the U.S. military and there are also different “Add On Kits” ,so there is no one stop answer,., They were first entered into service in 1985 and developed during the Cold War when ,improvised explosive devices, (IEDs) and ,asymmetric warfare, were not a major factor for military planners. It then made it’s name known around the World by it’s use in the 1991 Gulf War with significant low number of losses in combat. The Humvee will turn 35 this year and, like the Jeep utility vehicle it replaced in the 1980s, has achieved iconic status both in the military and beyond. ,It first came to national prominence during the First Gulf War, with rolling 24-hour news coverage (CNN especially) almost always including the Humvee to illustrate US military power and technological superiority. (This picture show an Up-Armoured HMMWV (,UAH,) in Iraq with the bulletproof doors, windows and plenty of protection for the operator standing up on the crew served weapon system,) Here is the basic answers first without the history of the US Armed Forces slowly up-armouring their HMMWVs over the decades. The armour kits (see down below for different kits) for Humvees produced by Zeroline are compatible with both M1114 and M1116 versions: The Zeroline suit protects the passenger compartment with an armoured cage mounted on an integral titanium frame that also provides roll over protection. The kit is designed to meet STANAG Level 2 threats, as well as enhanced penetration ammunition, such as APM2 and B32 cartridges fired from high power SVD rifles. The engine compartment is also protected, retaining mobility under attack. The kit also includes mine protection (5kg contact detonation under each wheel). The complete 11 part kit weighs 1,907kg. The armour is based on SiTx-OP composites, combining glass plate with a mosaic of ceramic face tiles, mounted on aramid woven fabric spall liner. This composition is designed to defeat multiple hits of standard and enhanced penetration rounds as well as fragmentation and high explosive charges. The kit also includes a two piece, 53mm thick armoured windshield and side windows. The aerial density of the transparent armour is 140Kg/m2 – three times higher than opaque armour. It is composed of two types of glasses – the outer surface is super hardened, designed to break hardened steel core penetrators. The inner glass layer uses high strength glass, optimized for absorbing the kinetic energy of the residual fragments. The floor is fitted with an external blast attenuation layer, constructed from TABRE composites. This material is also applied to the wheel arches and the base of the passenger compartment, to minimize the explosion effect of land mines. In order to sustain the additional load, the vehicle is refitted with heavy duty springs, adjustable heavy duty coil over shock absorbers, new anti-roll bars and composite brake pads. The vehicle is also fitted with fire resistant fuel tank and run flat tires. The HMMWV was designed primarily for personnel and light cargo transport behind front lines, not as a front line fighting vehicle! However when the first ,UAH ,become operational in 1996 its main role was to serve as a Scout Reconnaissance vehicle that could get close to the enemy then break posible contact (because of her speed and manoeuvrability and return to a safety in an area or base. HMMWVs serve as cargo/troop carriers, automatic weapons platforms, ambulances (that can carry up to four litter patients or eight ambulatory patients), M220 ,TOW missile, carriers, ,M119 howitzer, prime movers, ,M1097 Avenger, Pedestal Mounted Stinger platforms, MRQ-12 direct ,air support, vehicles, S250 shelter carriers, and other roles. The HMMWV is capable of ,fording, 2.5 ft (76 cm) normally, or 5 ft (1.5 m) with the deep-water fording kits installed. So the next time it was deployed in combat was in Somalia and the now infamous ,Battle of Mogadishu ,known to most people as ,Black Hawk Down., The Model used in as part of column of 9 HMMWVs and M35s was the M1025 with either the M2 .50 cal or Mk19 40mm AGL as there crew served weapon. (75th Rangers next to a M1025 HMMWV in Somalia. Notice how they have striped the doors off for several reasons) The operator on that weapon system back then didn’t have any sort of Gunner’s Shield (see pic) above) and seeing it was in a 3D Urban battlefield with small arms and RPGs coming from every direction left him extremely exposed and why the first Killed in Action was Ranger Sergeant Dominick Pilla on the .50 cal turret. (First basic guns shield retro fitted on older model Humvees) These HMMWVs back then in 1993 were basically “tin plated” and a 7.62 x 39mm AK-47 round would go through one door, through a soldier and out the other door as well as facing incoming RPG-7 rounds that would just be catastrophic with a direct hit. Although the relief column of over 100 vehicles was spearheaded by Malaysian Condor Armoured Personnel Carriers and Pakistani M48 ,Patton ,tanks at the rear were still soft skinned HMMWVs and M35 "Deuce and a Half" trucks. Hindsight is 20/20 however General Garrison planned a raid and to exfil everyone (soldiers and prisoners) in a column of 9 HMMWVs and Deuce and a Half’s with no armoured ground Quick Reaction Force in the middle of the day because he hadn’t told the other UN Peacekeepers of the mission. They were raiding the territory of a heavily armed, semi-organised, high on drugs (khat) militia loyal to ,Mohamed Farrah Aidid, in the Bakaara Market in only soft skinned vehicles (Humvees & M35 trucks) without even a gun shield for the Gunner! So AFTER 19 US Soldiers and pilots were Killed in Action and dozens more severely wounded because of the limitations and little protection that the original M1025s had it was time for the US Army to look at add-on armour packages for their Humvees. So they started with the XM1109. The X before the M meaning it was “experimental” to begin. The M1109 HMMWV was the first so-called “Up-Armoured” variant. It was an armament carrier configuration. The vehicle was equipped with additional armour both on the sides and underneath to protect the crew from small arms ammunition and mines. The requirements for the M1109 included: Underbody protection for the crew compartment against mines and unexploded ordnance of 1 pound explosive weight (up to 12 pounds was desirable and appeared possible) Three hundred sixty degree ballistic protection for the crew from small arms up to 7.62-mm NATO Armour Piercing ammunition Overhead protection from artillery fragmentation exploding from 20m to 100m from the HMMWV A 2,300 pound payload Mounting and power for the AN/UAS-11 or AN/UAS-12 Tube Launched Optically Tracked Wire Guided Missiles (TOW) sights (or later scout sights/sensor systems During the early stages of both the War in Afghanistan and the 2003 Iraq War the Humvee was liked by troops for its ability to access rough, mountainous terrain. Some soldiers would remove features from Humvees, including what little armour it had and sometimes even entire doors (,see pic above,), to make them lighter and more manoeuvrable for off-road conditions and to increase visibility. However over the years they became very vulnerable to IEDs; in the first four months of 2006, 67 U.S. troops died in Humvees After the stop gap M1109 came the M1114 UAH (Up-Armoured Humvee) as the purpose-built version of the Humvee family line intended to provide better protection for crew and systems alike. Based on the successes of the up-armoured M1109 HMMWV vehicle, the M1114 ,(entered service in 1996), featured a revised armour allocation with protection from various points across the base HMMWV design: The XM1114 underwent a series of ballistics trials to test the validity of the concept beginning in September of 1995. Armour was integrated into the existing Humvee frame: Consisted of welded aluminium, composite and steel. Basic armour protection allowed for the stoppage of 7.62mm ammunition from up to 100 yards away. The forward-underside of the vehicle could withstand a blast from a 12-lb mine while the rear of the vehicle could withstand up to a 4-lb mine blast. Additionally, all-around protection allowed the vehicle and crew to survive fragmentation blasts from a 155mm artillery piece. The exterior received attention, the interior was also revised to feature fragmentation-defeating armour should any munitions penetrate into the cabin. An armoured Humvee has a 2-inch-thick windshield and windows and a metal-composite skin (see No. 1) that can stop bullets (Notice the thickness and weight of the doors and windows and the 360 degree gun shield for the crew served weapon operator) There are several add on protection Humvee “Kits” for older Models still in service such as the: Up-Armoured HMMWV (UAH) kit FRAG (Fragmentary Armour Kits) kits 1, 1a, 2, and 5, GPK (Gunner Protection Kit) or MCTAGS (Marine Corps Transparent Armour Gun Shield ) for the gunner’s protection. This up-armoured package provides the occupants with ballistics protection through a full 360º, in addition to overhead and underbody blast protection. The M1114 HMMWV weighs about 900 kg more than the standard HMMWV and included 900 kg steel-plated doors, steel plating under the cab and several layers of bonded, ballistic-resistant glass to replace zip-up plastic windows. The forward-underside of the vehicle could withstand a blast from a 5.5 kg mine while the rear of the vehicle could withstand up to a 2 kg mine blast Around 2004, purpose made retrofit kits stated above as the M1114 up-armoured vehicles started reaching units. Several variants of purpose produced armour were made and shipped into theatre as the production of M1114s could not meet demand. The purpose build kits included air conditioning units, which were not a luxury item, but required to make driving in a highly contained unit tolerable. The M1114 and later up-armour kits were proof against small arms and HMG fire. They even had effective flame suppression systems. After experiences with IEDs, small arms/RPG fire and land mines in Afghanistan and Iraq theatres towards Humvees proved to have little protection for the occupants thus came the development of what we know today as the Mine-Resistant, Ambush Protected (,MRAP,) vehicles. The US Defence Department now has an over supply of MRAPs so they are off loading them to US Law Enforcement Agencies that meet their criteria. (Cougar 6x6 MRAP) So in the end the U.S. Marine Corps decided to start replacing Humvees in combat with vehicles in 2007, and the U.S. Army stated that the vehicle was "no longer feasible for combat" in 2012. They are all being phased out by the ,Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, (,JLTV,) below:
If you needed to create a personal army, which standard-issue assault/battle rifle and sidearm would you choose? Which tank and fighter jet? And why?
DISCLAIMER: I may not get some stuff wrong here, realistically speeking. I may use the wrong terms, names, and more. Anyway. Please let me know in the comments If I do mess up. Enjoy. Anyway, I guess personal/private militaries try to stay as cheap as possible, so I’ll try to do just that. My personal army/military (I will just refer to it as military) will be more of a defence force, So I probably won’t be adding bombers and/or other ground-attack/strike aircraft to my list. Anyway, let’s begin. Rifle: MARS-L I’d choose this because of low cost, availability and Modularity. It is currently the rifle being used in all services in the NZDF (,New Zealand Defence Force) For attachments, for now I can’t really be bothered to find some decent sights and stuff, so imagine my rifle would look a little bit like this: This isn’t an actual Mars-L the closest thing I could find to it, was a M4A1. DMR: L129A1 The rifle would look a bit like this, but with the listed attachments, written below,. . . . The attachments that I’d go for would probably be; -,UTG 3-9X32 Compact CQB Bug Buster AO RGB Scope, (,Yes, I just copied and pasted that) -HARRIS ENGINEERING 6 - 9” BIPOD -,Streamlight 69260 TLR-1 HL Weapon Mount Tactical Flashlight Light 800 Lumens with Strobe Pistol: Glock 17 Gen 4 I chose the Glock because it is pretty much the first thing that come to my mind when I think of a pistol. Pretty Solid, reliable handgun, and I guess it is a decent price for what you are getting for. The Glock would be issued to every member of my armed forces. I won’t be putting any attachments on them, because they often look silly. Yeah, nah. For a ,light machine gun ,(,LMG for short), ,I will chose the ,Ultimax 100, Mark 5. I didn’t really feel like going for well-known LMGs like the FN Minimi/M249, or the PKM, because I guess I wanted my answer to be more unique. The Ultimax 100 is a Singaporean-made gun, and from what I’ve read, it seems to be a pretty solid weapon. This is the Ultimax 100, however, I don’t think that this is a Mark 5. My setup would probably be like this. I’d rather have the drum than a magazine, but I guess that adds more to the weight of the weapon. The gun is pretty light for an LMG. For example, the M249 weighs about 7.5 kilograms, while the Ultimax 100 weighs around 4.7 kilograms. Pretty good for a LMG, I suppose. Recoilless rifle: Carl Gustaf I choose the Carl Gustaf, because it is a pretty well-known weapon. A lot of Militaries already use it, for example, the Australia, USA, New Zealand, Sweden, and much more. If you’re interested in seeing all of the Carl Gustaf users, then here’s a link: Carl Gustaf recoilless rifle - Wikipedia . . . A typical squad/section of soldiers would consist of 20 men. -10* would be armed with the Mars-L -4 would be armed with the L129A1 -4 would be armed with the Ultimax 100 -2 would be armed with the Carl Gustaf . . *3 would be trained as combat medics Now, on to vehicles. So, what will carry those 20 soldiers? APC: The M113A3, and M113 ARV There will be 2 M113s per section, which means 10 soldiers in each personal carrier. I chose the M113 because they are a proven platform, however, they are starting to get obsolete. I would operate 30 M113s, 20 for my Infantry sections, and an additional 10, 5 would be for backups, in case something happens and a M113 from an Infantry section breaks down/gets destroyed, and the other 5 would be ARVs, if that makes sense*. They are relatively cheap, so I guess that helps. I will basically use it as a battle taxi, but not a field ambulance. So that leads us to our next vehicle: *20 M113A3s used as Personnel carriers, 5 M113A3s used for backup, and the other 5 used as recovery vehicles. Bushmaster PMV. I love this thing. I mean, what a badass name. ,BUSHMASTER,. Hell yeah. I’ve had the pleasure of being inside these, and they are I guess really nice, considering the fact that it is a military vehicle. The conditions in it would probably change if it was at war, however. Anyway. It is a very solid vehicle, and not one Australian soldier has died in one. It is a pretty reliable, and well protected from small-arms fire and land mines/IEDs. I would use the Bushmaster as an ambulance/MEDEVAC. Each squad/section would have one of these. Ambulance variant of the Bushmaster. I would operate 30 Bushmasters, 15 as Ambulances, 5 command vehicles, and 10 as Personnel carriers/support vehicles. Only 10 ambulances would be used for my infantry sections. The rest would obviously be used for support. IFV: CV90 I don’t really know why this is here, I really just typed into google “Best IFVs”. The CV90 was one that list. Here is a link: The 10 best infantry fighting vehicles Anyway, all I really needed was something that was good at supporting my Infantry. If it’s shit, I’ll probably change it, but I guess it looks like a pretty solid vehicle. Each section would have 1 of them. So in all, I would have 10 Infantry sections, which means that I would operate 10 CV90s. However, I would also operate an additional 20 CV90s, as Patrol vehicles/light tanks. So all in all, I would operate 30 CV90s. That is what a typical Mechanized infantry section would look like. Now, on to vehicles that my Military would use. light tank/ARV (,Armoured Reconnaissance Vehicle ): ,FV101 Scorpion It’s pretty small, Aye? I will use this because it is relatively cheap, very nimble (for a tank), small, and it seems good enough to counter rough terrain. Sure, it doesn’t really stand a chance against MBTs like the T-90 or M1A2, but that’s alright. It wasn’t built to. Remember, I’m not building a full-blown military here, just a personal defence force, defending some land. I will include an MBT in this list, and it is coming right up… Anyway, I will probably have around 50 of these vehicles. MBT (,Main Battle Tank),:, Leopard 2A4 A Dutch kitty playing in the dirt I choose the Leopard 2A4, because I didn’t really want to go over the top. It is a pretty solid platform, and I think around maybe 30 of these would be good for my military. Again, the leopard isn’t as good as top-tier tanks such as the M1A2 and T-90, but it definitely has a bigger chance of stopping one than a CV90 or FV101. It will also most likely beat Soviet Union/Cold war era tanks. I guess that’s the reason why I didn’t want to chose a T-72* or even worse, a T-55. *,I meant earlier variations of the T-72, not the latest models, because it would be a pretty good fight between a Leopard 2A4 and a later-model T-72. For example, the T-72B3. Light Utility Vehicle/multi-role vehicle: G-Wagon I’ll list things from top to bottom 1.,The top 6x6 G-wagon would be used as a mobile command post vehicle. 2., The open-top would be used for Surveillance and Reconnaissance 3. ,The 4x4 one,* ,would be used as a utility vehicle/troop transport, and that’s basically it. I didn’t really want the M113 to do all of the work, because it isn’t as comfortable as a G-wagon, from my experience of being able to explore one. 4., The Line Laying Module would be used to support communication systems, and running cables/wire. 5. ,The General Maintenance Vehicle would be used to help repair vehicles or anything that has been broken down in the field. *,I’m sure they all have proper names, I just couldn’t find them. Let me know in the comments if you happen to know the names of them. Cheers. . . The reason I chose the G-wagons was because they look pretty good, but then again, aesthetics come second to function, so the real reason I chose them is because they are affordable, coming at around $124,500 AUD, for a civilian version. Obviously mine would be fitted with a radio and maybe some additional Armor. I also have another utility vehicle, which is going to be a Ford Ranger. Sorry, I couldn’t get a clear image. Anyway, I’ll use this as well, because it has a tray. Very useful indeed. Of course, I would make some modifications, like a bull-bar, better lights, a winch, radio, and probably a gun on top. I’d also change the colour to my camouflage-pattern. I will operate: -100 G-wagons in total, (40 4x4s, 20 reconnaissance vehicles, 15 command post vehicles, 10 communication support vehicles, and 15 maintenance vehicles) - 30 Ford rangers Anti-aircraft: Rapier ADMS and M163 VADS Top Image: M163 VADS Bottom Image: Rapier ADMS So I chose these two, because they are pretty affordable, and the M163 is based on the M113, which means I could interchange spare parts between them. I wanted a SAM and also a self propelled anti aircraft gun, so I could have more flexibility when trying to shoot down aircraft, I guess. The Rapier could also be towed by my Utility vehicles, which also means more flexibility. I’d operate 12 M163s, and 6 Rapiers. Trucks: M915A5 and M939 Top image: M915A5 Bottom image: M939 Just some trucks, aye? In all seriousness, I chose these because they are… um… American. Yeah. I like American trucks. . . Anyway, I would use these to haul everything that needs to be transported, and both are reliable and proven platforms, that will get the things that I need transported from point A to point B. They also could realistically be used as budget personnel carriers, but they wouldn’t have that much protection. I’d probably operate 5 M915A5s, and 10 M939s. That should be enough to deliver my stuff around. Tank destroyer//Artillery/SPG ,(,Self-propelled gun): ,M109A2, L118 Light Gun, M252 mortar I would rather use these than a M777 155mm lightweight towed howitzer, because this is Self-propelled. This means that It doesn’t need to be towed. I would operate 30, so I can have more capability in supporting Infantry. I would use the L118 for Infantry support. Nothing really special about it, I guess. I would operate around 20 of these. I would use the M252 mortar the same way as the L118, Infantry support. Only difference is that the M252 is smaller, so I could store more. I would operate around 60 of these. Multi-Mission Radar: Ground Master 60 Ok, so these would cost a lot. I couldn’t find an actual price, but it does look pretty pricey. I would use these to detect most types of targets, like aircraft, artillery, and much more. It is a short-range radar, and It can operate up to 80 kilometres. It can operate in intense jamming situations, and will provide me with an accurate target designation. I’ve read that it has high mobility, and a low-cost Life cycle. I would acquire 6 of these. Amphibious Assault Vehicle:, ,AAV-7 (LVTP-7) I would use this for taking over small islands, with little or no population. It is a pretty old Vehicle, but that doesn’t worry me that much, because I probably won’t encounter any militaries with state-of-the-art equipment. I would operate around 20 of these, but own 30 in case some break down. Like I said, the AAV-7 is pretty old, and is currently being phased out, so I want some extra vehicles in case one breaks down or I need spare parts. Amphibious Cargo Vehicle: LARC-V I’d use it when there are floods, and to transport things across bodies of water. I will operate 20 of these. Extras: DAGOR A1,, used for security, reconnaissance, and I guess light transport. I’m using 40 of these. Kawasaki KLR250, ,Also used for security, reconnaissance, and to deliver message in case any other way of communication via radio/phone are down/not working. I will use 30 of these. So, I guess that’s the end of my Army. Next: NAVY… I’ll come back to this answer later, and edit it, eventually adding a Navy and Airforce. Hope you enjoyed.
FAQs Terkait ford ranger 6x6
Does Ford Ranger has Cruise Control?
Yes, Ford Ranger has Cruise Control, which are: 2020 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo, 2019 Ford Ranger 2.0L XLT Limited Edition, 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT (M), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 Si-Turbo XLT+ (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 WildTrak 4x2 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo WildTrak 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4x4 (M), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 XLT 4x4 (M), 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 XLT 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 WildTrak 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 WildTrak 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo, 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo WildTrak 4x4 (A).
What is the 0-100 km/h (s) of Ford Ranger?
Here are the 0-100 km/h (s) and variants of Ford Ranger:
Variants 2020 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 2018 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 0-100 km/h (s) 10.5 10.5 Is Ford Ranger available in Hill Start Assist?
Yes, Ford Ranger is available in Hill Start Assist. The available Hill Start Assist variants are: 2020 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo, 2019 Ford Ranger 2.0L XLT Limited Edition, 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL Single Cab (M), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL (M), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT (M), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 Si-Turbo XLT+ (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 WildTrak 4x2 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo WildTrak 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL 4x4 High Rider Single Cab MT, 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL 4x4 (M), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4x4 (M), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 XLT 4x4 (M), 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 XLT 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 WildTrak 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 WildTrak 4x4 (A), 2018 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo.
Beranda